RTI >> Judgments >> High Court >> Miscellaneous (Law of Precedence, Compliant and Appeal, Freedom of Speech, Transparency in admission/selection)
Supreme Court(Miscellaneous (Law of Precedence, Compliant and Appeal, Freedom of Speech, Transparency in admission/selection))/ CIC(Miscellaneous (Law of Precedence, Compliant and Appeal, Freedom of Speech, Transparency in admission/selection))
| S.No. | HIGH COURT CASE | DATE OF JUDGMENT | JUDGMENT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 |
MISC. BENCH No. - 549 of 2010 HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (37.64 KB) 
|
27 Jan, 2010 | Dr. V.S. Srivastava VS. State Information Commission The petitioner had applied for information under Right to Information Act to know that under what authority and law allegedly the wall in question was taken as unauthorized and, therefore, demolished. The Court held that, under what authority or rule, the wall in question has been demolished, is not an information which can normally be asked for under the Right to Information Act. |
| 62 |
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 428 of 2010. HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (113.23 KB)
|
21 Jan, 2010 | Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 428 of 2010. The High Court held that, Central Information Commissioner having not adverted to the relevant reply submitted by the petitioner and there being no reason given in the order impugned, the order dated 16 th December, 2009 deserves to be and is hereby set-aside remitting the matter to the Central Information Commissioner to pass fresh order in accordance with law. |
| 63 |
WP (C) 4788 of 2008 (541.35 KB)
|
30 Nov, 2009 | UOI Vs CIC In view of section 22 of the RTI Act reference to the provisions of the Army Act and the subordinate legislation made there under is irrelevant. Whether or not information should be furnished has to be examined in the light of section 8(1) of the RTI Act. |
Total Case uploaded: 63